Kinda' of a drag ... you say? The odd thing about this news report (link below) is the
mating of the conservative news group (WSJ) and a more moderate bunch at (NBC).
Which begs the question, is it cheaper to get polling data when two news companies
request information, rather than just one? Kind of like a fast-food burger plate special.
'Grumpy old...' is a rewrite (albeit, better and more developed) of a news post noting
that three-quarters of older Americans perceive that their kids will have less brighter of a future than they
had during theirs.
'Hey Poppy...take off those doubled up sunglasses!? ...What did you say Sonny?
Since most of us don't actually get to see those polling questions or all of the results:
We don't know relative background information, if any, that might have effected their
reply when polled about the future. For example, did Grandpa's smart phone turnout
to be too smart or put Gramp's in a funk about the future. Or visa-versa, does Gram
think thou Twitter's too-much & as such, idles' away one's future husband prospects.
Not to mention a possible lady catch for the guy, that still struggles with dirty laundry.
You catch my drift ... polls are relative ... like a photo and mostly captures the moment.
Maybe we should only ask the boomers polling questions at holiday dinners or when
they are surfing the web. Technology, or the lack thereof, may be the actual poll Q&A.
Related news report:
